Why I built this
Every initiative looked fundable on its own. Together, they created two cash gaps nobody had seen.
I sat through AI trainings from several firms. Every one promised real, practical finance cases. I left each one with nothing I could reuse, so I stopped going.
I tried AI on financial modeling myself. The results were bad. Meanwhile, I saw other people using it for real work, while most of us were drafting emails with it. That's buying a Ferrari to drive to the mailbox.
Then I had no choice.
I had two days before a Monday meeting where the executive team needed to see the impact of a set of investments we wanted to make. I could put my team on it all weekend, with no guarantee. Or I could do it myself, with AI.
I chose AI, and for most of the first day I was scared. I spent about two-thirds of my time writing instructions instead of building. Every hour there was an hour I wouldn't have if the result came back wrong.
Then the first model came back. The structure was right. Not perfect, but right.
After 27 hours, I had a complete model: assumptions documented, checks built in, clear enough for anyone to decide from. Work I would have expected to take a month. Then I ran it through a dashboard builder I'd already made.
What it showed
The plan was to launch all the initiatives at once. Nobody had a clear view of the cost or the cash impact. The model and the dashboard made it visible: two cash gaps ahead, the second far bigger than the first.
So we tested scenarios, switched initiatives on and off, and decided which projects to launch now, which to delay, and what each choice did to cash and our key metrics.
That weekend is what you take home: the builders, ready to load, so you never start from a blank page.
